If you’ve ever wondered how the Democratic Party keeps its fundraising juggernaut humming, look no further than ActBlue—a platform that’s raised billions for left-leaning candidates and causes since 2004. It’s the golden goose of grassroots giving, or so they’d have you believe. But beneath the shiny veneer of “small-dollar donor empowerment” lies a festering mess of allegations: money laundering, identity theft, and a reckless disregard for campaign finance laws. ActBlue isn’t just a tool for mobilizing the base—it’s starting to look like a conveyor belt for dirty cash.

In an era of shifting global dynamics, the term “globalist” has become a lightning rod for debate, often shrouded in conspiracy theories and political rhetoric. Yet, beneath the noise lies a compelling historical narrative—one that suggests a deliberate strategy by powerful elites to reshape the world order. This blog article delves into two provocative claims from a so-called “Exclusive Historical Analysis”: first, how globalists allegedly use communism as a tool to collapse nations and usher in a New World Order (NWO) system; and second, how a counter-strategy of “soft conquest through exceptionalism” might thwart this supposed tyrannical takeover. Let’s unpack these ideas, compare them, and explore their implications.